With the collaboration of Iran Polymer Society

Document Type : Original research

Authors

Polymeric Materials Research Group (PMRG), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave., Tehran, IR

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to first make two compatibilizers, i.e., maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (PP-g-MA), based on a homo-and a block copolymer. Then, these custom made compatibilizers were incorporated in PP/nanoclay composites made via direct and two-step masterbatch techniques. The influence of compatibilizer/nanoclay ratio was examined in the direct method. In the two-step processing technique, the compatibilizer content was divided to two parts such that the first part was used when making the masterbatch and the second part was incorporated in the second step when the masterbatch was diluted by the polymer matrix. The characterizations via titration test and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed a higher degree of grafting reaction when homo-polymer was used for synthesizing PP-g-MA. In the next step, nanocomposites containing 3 wt.% nanoclay with three different PP-g-MA (both types)/nanoclay ratios of 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1 were made using a co-rotating twin screw extruder. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was done to evaluate morphology and tensile and impact, and tests were performed to evaluate the mechanical properties of the PP samples. Based on the results, maleic anhydride grafted homo-polypropylene (HPP-g-MA) and the composition containing HPP-g-MA/nanoclay ratio of 2:1 with 7.69% improvement in Young’s modulus was reported as the recommended compatibilizer and ratio for applications. Finally, five nanocomposite samples with identical composition were made in two steps. A masterbatch containing 15 wt.% nanoclay was made first and then, it was diluted with PP to reduce the nanoclay content to 3 wt.%. All samples containing 6 wt.% PP-g-MA, but the method of addition of compatibilizer was different. In one sample, the whole compatibilizer was added into the masterbatch. In another sample, the entire PP-g-MA was added in the second stage of compounding. In the other three samples, the addition of compatibilizer was divided between the two stages of the process. The results of the study showed that the highest improvement of elastic modulus (24.26%) was obtained when the majority of the compatibilizer was added in the second step of production. This was associated with the best dispersion of nanoclay platelets in the PP matrix.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Chafidz A, Faisal R, Kaavessina M, Hartanto D (2018) Non-isothermal crystallization and viscoelastic behavior of polypropylene/nanoclay composites fabricated from masterbatch by using a mini extruder. Defect Diffus Forum 382: 89-93 [CrossRef]
  2. Shokrollahi M, Marouf BT, Bagheri R (2022) Role of the nucleating agent masterbatch carrier resin in the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene. Polymer J 54: 1127-1132 [CrossRef]
  3. Hiziroglu HR, Shkolnik IE (2018) Electrical characteristics of polypropylene mixed with natural nanoclay. Polymers 10: 942 [CrossRef]
  4. Taktak S, Fakhfakh S, Rondot S, Tara A, Jbara O (2022) Behavior under electron irradiation of two clay-based polymer nanocomposites PPgMA/OMMT and PBS/OMMT. Mater Chem Phys 275: 125230 [CrossRef]
  5. Blazquez M, Marchante V, Gendre L, Starost K, Njuguna J, Schutz JA, Lacave JM, Egizabal A, Elizetxea C, Cajaraville MP (2020) Particle emission measurements in three scenarios of mechanical degradation of polypropylene-nanoclay nanocomposites. J Aerosol Sci 150: 105629 [CrossRef]
  6. Pettarin V, Brun F, Viana JC, Pouzada AS, Frontini PM (2013) Toughness distribution in complex PP/nanoclay injected mouldings. Compos Sci Technol 74: 28-36 [CrossRef]
  7. Paul D, Robeson L (2008) Polymer nanotechnology: Nanocomposites. Polymer 49: 3187-3204 [CrossRef]
  8. Kotal M, Bhowmick AK (2015) Polymer nanocomposites from modified clays: Recent advances and challenges. Prog Polym Sci 51: 127-187 [CrossRef]
  9. López‐Quintanilla ML, Sánchez‐Valdés S, Ramos de Valle LF, Medellín‐Rodríguez FJ (2006) Effect of some compatibilizing agents on clay dispersion of polypropylene‐clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4748-4756 [CrossRef]
  10. Abacha N, Fellahi S (2005) Synthesis of polypropylene‐graft‐maleic anhydride compatibilizer and evaluation of nylon 6/polypropylene blend properties. Polymer Int 54: 909-916 [CrossRef]
  11. Pruthtikul R, Liewchirakorn P (2010) Preparation of polypropylene graft maleic anhydride (PP-g-MA) via twin screw extrusion. Adv Mater Res 93-94: 451-454 [CrossRef]
  12. Güldoğan Y, Eğri S, Rzaev ZMO, Pişkin E (2004) Comparison of maleic anhydride grafting onto powder and granular polypropylene in the melt by reactive extrusion. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 3675-3684 [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang C, Shangguan Y, Chen R, Wu Y, Chen F, Zheng Q, Hu G (2010) Morphology, microstructure and compatibility of impact polypropylene copolymer. Polymer 51: 4969-4977 [CrossRef]
  14. Krishnamoorti R, Vaia RA (2001) Polymer Nanocomposites synthesis, characterization and

modeling, Vol. 804, ACS Publications [CrossRef]

  1. Krishnamoorti R, Vaia RA (2007) Polymer nanocomposites. J Polym Sci Pol Phys 45: 3252-3256 [CrossRef]
  2. Baniasadi H, Ramazani SA A, Javan Nikkhah S (2010) Investigation of in situ prepared polypropylene/clay nanocomposites properties and comparing to melt blending method. Mater Des 31: 76-84 [CrossRef]
  3. López-Quintanilla M, Sánchez-Valdés S, Ramos de Valle L, Guedea Miranda R (2006) Preparation and mechanical properties of PP/PP-g-MA/Org-MMT nanocomposites with different MA content. Polym Bull 57: 385-393 [CrossRef]
  4. Pascual J, Fages E, Fenollar O, García D, Balart R (2009) Influence of the compatibilizer/nanoclay ratio on final properties of polypropylene matrix modified with montmorillonite-based organoclay. Polym Bull 62: 367-380 [CrossRef]
  5. Chafidz A, Ali MA, Elleithy R (2011) Morphological, thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of polypropylene-nanoclay composites prepared from masterbatch in a twin screw extruder. J Mater Sci 46: 6075-6086 [CrossRef]
  6. Shroff Rama M, Neppalli R, Chellaswamy R, Swaminathan S (2010) Exfoliation of clay layers in polypropylene matrix using potassium succinate-g-polypropylene as compatibilizer. Compos Sci Technol 70: 1550-1556 [CrossRef]
  7. Nam BU, Son Y (2010) Evaluations of PP-g-GMA and PP-g-HEMA as a compatibilizer for polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. Polym Bull 65: 837-847 [CrossRef]
  8. Rodríguez‐Llamazares S, Rivas BL, Pérez M, Perrin‐Sarazin F, Maldonado A, Venegas C (2011) The effect of clay type and of clay–masterbatch product in the preparation of polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 122: 2013-2025 [CrossRef]
  9. Nguyen VK, Jin SH, Lee SH, Lee DS, Choe S (2006) Polypropylene/clay nanocomposites prepared with masterbatches of polypropylene ionomer and organoclay. Compos Interfaces 13: 299-310 [CrossRef]
  10. Darestani Farahani A (2013) Mechanical and microstructural evaluations of (high MFI PP/low MFI PP)/organoclay nanocomposites influence of clay loading, compatibilizer loading and processing, Master Thesis, Sharif University of Technology
  11. Moad G (1999) The synthesis of polyolefin graft copolymers by reactive extrusion. Prog Polym Sci 24: 81-142 [CrossRef]
  12. Oromehie AR, Hashemi SA, Meldrum IG, Waters DN (1997) Functionalisation of polypropylene with maleic anhydride and acrylic acid for compatibilising blends of polypropylene with poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polym Int 42: 117-120 [CrossRef]
  13. Beyler CL, Hirschler MM (2002) Thermal decomposition of polymers. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering 2, Section 1, Chapter 7, 111-131
  14. Tjong SC (2006) Structural and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng: R: Reports 53: 73-197 [CrossRef]
  15. Zanetti M, Camino G, Thomann R, Mülhaupt R (2001) Synthesis and thermal behaviour of layered silicate–EVA nanocomposites. Polymer 42: 4501-4507 [CrossRef]