Optimization of acoustic performance of EPDM-based foams using Taguchi design of experiments: Appropriate content of additives

Document Type : Original research

Authors

1 Department of Polymer Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Novel EPDM-based polymer foams were prepared using a combination of nanomaterials, namely nano silica, nano clay, and graphene nanoplatelets. In order to achieve optimal acoustic performance, the Taguchi design (TD) technique was applied to reduce the number of experiments and optimize the formulation. By employing an orthogonal array of L9(34), four controlled factors, including content of the three nanomaterials and the blowing agent (Unicell D200A), were chosen. In practice, the acoustic properties of the nine suggested experiments with TD were examined with an impedance tube, and the signal-to-noise ratio analysis revealed two more optimal formulations for foam composites. Further experiments for the last two formulations compared to the nine Taguchi tests, showed an improvement of 13.04 and 19.68%, respectively, for noise reduction coefficient (NRC) and average transmission loss (ATL). It seemed that the idea of using multiple nanomaterials simultaneously is to be an effective way. Besides, the SEM images of nine samples proved that the smaller cell size of the foam were achieved using the higher concentration of nanoparticles. These findings are in accordance with the acoustic results, as the sample with larger cell size and more open cells (C3) showed higher NRC and the sample with larger cell size and closed cells (B2) showed higher ATL values. To complete the study, some blank samples with zero level or only one type of the nanomaterial were also investigated. Interestingly, the obtained results indicated that the formula should contain more than one type of nanoparticle to achieve a better acoustic performance. Comparing the result obtained in this study for EPDM foam with the same EVA foam in our previous work, it can be seen that EPDM showed an increase of 15.56% in NRC and a slight decrease of 2.5% in ATL. This behavior could be due to the difference in their morphology, in which the EPDM has probably more open cells and thinner cell walls.

Graphical Abstract

Optimization of acoustic performance of EPDM-based foams using Taguchi design of experiments: Appropriate content of additives

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Chen L, Rende D, Schadler LS, Ozisik R (2013) Polymer nanocomposite foams. J Mater Chem A 1: 3837-3850
  2. Lee LJ, Zeng C, Cao X, Han X, Shen J, Xu G (2005) Polymer nanocomposite foams. Compos Sci Technol 65: 2344-2363
  3. Antunes M, Velasco JI (2019) Polymeric Foams. Polymers 11: 1179
  4. Bayat H, Fasihi M, Zare Y, Rhee KY (2020) An experimental study on one-step and two-step foaming of natural rubber/silica nanocomposites. Nano Rev 9: 427-435
  5. Moradi G, Monazzam M, Ershad-Langroudi A, Parsimehr H, Keshavarz ST (2020) Organoclay nanoparticles interaction in PU: PMMA IPN foams: Relationship between the cellular structure and damping-acoustical properties. Appl Acoust 164: 107295
  6. Danihelová A, Němec, M, Gergeľ T, Gejdoš M, Gordanová J, Sčensný P (2019) Usage of recycled technical textiles as thermal insulation and an acoustic absorber. Sustainability 11: 2968
  7. Hasanzadeh R, Azdast T, Doniavi A, Lee RE (2019) Multi-objective optimization of heat transfer mechanisms of microcellular polymeric foams from thermal-insulation point of view. Therm Sci Eng Prog 9: 21-29
  8. Gedler G, Antunes M, Velasco JI, Ozisik R (2016) Enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of polycarbonate/ graphene nanocomposites foamed via 1-step supercritical carbon dioxide process. Mater Des 90: 906-914
  9. Chen QZ (2011) Foaming technology of tissue engineering scaffolds-a review. Bubble Sci Eng Technol 3: 34-47
  10. Kumar A, Patham B, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2022) Polyolefinic nanocomposite foams: Review of microstructure-property relationships, applications, and processing considerations. J Cell Plast 58: 59-102
  11. Wang B, Peng Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Y (2007) Compressive response and energy absorption of foam EPDM. J Appl Polym Sci 105: 3462-3469
  12. Wang X, Wang Y, Ma L, Guo H, Yang C, Liu N, Wang J (2020) Design of ethylene-propylenediene monomer foam and its double-layer composite for improving sound absorption properties via experimental method and theoretical verification. Polym Eng Sci 60: 1877-1889
  13. Shojaei Dindarloo A, Karrabi M, Hamid M, Ghoreishy R (2019) Various nanoparticles influences on structure, viscoelastic, Vulcanization and mechanical behaviour of EPDM nano-composite rubber foam. Plast Rubber Compos 48: 218-225
  14. Eyssa HM, Afifi M, Moustafa H (2023) Improvement of the acoustic and mechanical properties of sponge ethylene propylene diene rubber/carbon nanotube composites crosslinked by subsequent sulfur and electron beam irradiation. Polym Int 72: 87-98
  15. Hosseinpour A, Katbab AA, Ohadi A (2022) Improving the sound absorption of a highly deformable nanocomposite foam based on ethylene-propylene-diene-monomer (EPDM) infused with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) to absorb low-frequency waves. Eur Polym J: 178: 111522
  16. Hosseinpour A, Katbab AA, Ohadi A (2022) A novel sound absorber foam based on ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) to absorb low-frequency waves: Influence of EPDM ethylene content. Polym Eng Sci 62: 2207-2218
  17. Kuczmarski MA, Johnston JC (2011) Acoustic absorption in porous materials. NASA Technical Reports Server: 20110011143
  18. Cao L, Fu Q, Si Y, Ding B, Yu J (2018) Porous materials for sound absorption. Composites Communications 10: 25-35
  19. Lee J, Kim GH, Ha CS (2012) Sound absorption properties of polyurethane/nano-silica nanocomposite foams. J Appl Polym Sci 123: 2384-2390
  20. Wei GO, Long Y, Ban DM, Yin XG, Li HE, Hai FU (2019) Study of the sound absorption performance of ethylene-vinyl acetate foam materials. Mater Sci 25: 427-432
  21. Mareze PH, Brandao E, Fonseca WD, Silva OM, Lenzi A (2019) Modeling of acoustic porous material absorber using rigid multiple microducts network: Validation of the proposed model. J Sound Vib 443: 376-396
  22. Asadi M, Ohadi A (2015) Improving sound absorption of polyurethane foams by the incorporation of nano-particles," In: The 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Italy, Florence
  23. Vahidifar A, Esmizadeh E, Rostami E, Nouri Khorasani S, Rodrigue D (2019) Morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties of hybrid elastomeric foams based on natural rubber, nanoclay, and nanocarbon black. Polym Compos 40: 4289-4299
  24. Bartolini R, Filippozzi S, Princi E, Schenone C, Vicini S (2010) Acoustic and mechanical properties of expanded clay granulates consolidated by epoxy resin. Appl Clay Sci 48: 460-465
  25. Simón-Herrero C, Peco N, Romero A, Valverde JL, Sánchez-Silva L (2019) PVA/nanoclay/ graphene oxide aerogels with enhanced sound absorption properties. Appl Acoust 156: 40-45
  26. Nourmohammadi M, Jahanmardi R, Moeenfard H, Zohuri GH, Bazgir S (2022) Development of optimal polymeric foams with superior sound absorption and transmission loss. J Appl Polym Sci 139: e52507
  27. Molani S, Azdast T, Doniavi A, Hasanzadeh R, Moradian M, Mamaghani Shishavan S (2018) A Taguchi analysis on structural properties of polypropylene microcellular nanocomposite foams containing Fe2O3 nanoparticles in batch process. Plast Rubber Compos 47: 106-112
  28. ASTM D792-08 (2008) Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement
  29. ASTM D412 (2013) Standard test methods for vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers-tension
  30. EN ISO 10534-2:2001 (2001) Acoustics – determination of sound absorption coefficient and impedance in impedance tubes - Part 2: transfer-function method
  31. Impedance Tube SW420/SW470/SW422, 2021: http://bswa.oss-cn-shanghai.aliyuncs. com/202107/20210729135950807.pdf
  32. Jiang Y, Chen S, Wang D, Chen J (2017) Multi-objective optimization of acoustical properties of PU-bamboo-chips foam composites. Arch Acoust 42: 707-714
  33. Zhu T, Chen S, Zhu W, Wang Y (2018) Optimization of sound absorption property for polyurethane foam using adaptive simulated annealing algorithm. J Appl Polym Sci 135: 46426
  34. Rende D, Schadler LS, Ozisik R (2013) Controlling foam morphology of poly (methyl methacrylate) via surface chemistry and concentration of silica nanoparticles and supercritical carbon dioxide process parameters. J Chem 2013: 864926
Polyolefins Journal
Volume 10, Issue 4 - Serial Number 22
November 2023
Pages 211-224

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 08 May 2023
  • Revise Date: 24 June 2023
  • Accept Date: 01 July 2023
  • First Publish Date: 09 July 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics